<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter on the Web: Not Exactly Up to Date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:52:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: clarua</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-1118653</link>
		<dc:creator>clarua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8551#comment-1118653</guid>
		<description>I really thankful for give me such a nice chance to read your article plus to comment about your article.I read your article about &quot;Twitter on the Web: Not Exactly Up to Date&quot;Thank you..

&lt;a href=&quot;http://earthcast.tv&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;affairs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really thankful for give me such a nice chance to read your article plus to comment about your article.I read your article about &#8220;Twitter on the Web: Not Exactly Up to Date&#8221;Thank you..</p>
<p><a href="http://earthcast.tv" rel="nofollow">affairs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thord Daniel Hedengren</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-604240</link>
		<dc:creator>Thord Daniel Hedengren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8551#comment-604240</guid>
		<description>That was pretty cynical, Paul. :)

For the record, it appears that they&#039;ve fixed the &quot;latest tweet&quot; bug for me now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was pretty cynical, Paul. :)</p>
<p>For the record, it appears that they&#8217;ve fixed the &#8220;latest tweet&#8221; bug for me now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul William Tenny</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-604114</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul William Tenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8551#comment-604114</guid>
		<description>The problem with young startups like Twitter (and Newsvine) is that they don&#039;t have any corporate discipline. They spend all their time making their pages a little bit more pretty, or adding just one more shiny (but ultimately useless) feature. 90% innovation, 10% fixing bugs or design flaws from the previous 90%. Nothing that annoys users/customers ever gets fixed and so their relative value as an entity never goes up, it just stagnates.

Do you think IM is ever coming back? Does anyone honestly believe they&#039;ve spent as much time working on it as they did adding the little note in your sidebar (which is gone now that everyone is used to that feature being disappeared)?

Of course not. Why would anyone want to slave away for a couple months fixing a flawed architecture when they can spend their lazy afternoons playing with page designs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with young startups like Twitter (and Newsvine) is that they don&#8217;t have any corporate discipline. They spend all their time making their pages a little bit more pretty, or adding just one more shiny (but ultimately useless) feature. 90% innovation, 10% fixing bugs or design flaws from the previous 90%. Nothing that annoys users/customers ever gets fixed and so their relative value as an entity never goes up, it just stagnates.</p>
<p>Do you think IM is ever coming back? Does anyone honestly believe they&#8217;ve spent as much time working on it as they did adding the little note in your sidebar (which is gone now that everyone is used to that feature being disappeared)?</p>
<p>Of course not. Why would anyone want to slave away for a couple months fixing a flawed architecture when they can spend their lazy afternoons playing with page designs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-603980</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8551#comment-603980</guid>
		<description>The other search feature by the way is all the way at the verrryyyy bottom of the page on the &quot;about us&quot; nav bar.

http://search.twitter.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other search feature by the way is all the way at the verrryyyy bottom of the page on the &#8220;about us&#8221; nav bar.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.twitter.com/" rel="nofollow">http://search.twitter.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymoen</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-603908</link>
		<dc:creator>mymoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8551#comment-603908</guid>
		<description>wauw, nice shown or new twiter.. i love it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wauw, nice shown or new twiter.. i love it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-603874</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8551#comment-603874</guid>
		<description>https://twitter.com/invitations

Search TAB is there.  Just not as obvious though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://twitter.com/invitations" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/invitations</a></p>
<p>Search TAB is there.  Just not as obvious though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan McLean</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/09/22/twitter-on-the-web-not-exactly-up-to-date/comment-page-1/#comment-603799</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=8551#comment-603799</guid>
		<description>Hmm that is a little funky. I am not a big twitter user so I can&#039;t say I have seen anything funky....
If I see something I will let you know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm that is a little funky. I am not a big twitter user so I can&#8217;t say I have seen anything funky&#8230;.<br />
If I see something I will let you know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

