<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sinister Sibling of Paid Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/11/10/the-sinister-sibling-of-paid-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/11/10/the-sinister-sibling-of-paid-reviews/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/11/10/the-sinister-sibling-of-paid-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-1113278</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=9309#comment-1113278</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting all this info together in one post. Lots of bloggers are only citing the case against Travel Golf Media and venting about it instead of explaining the entire story and revealing that the case is already closed!
It&#039;s good to be reminded of Section 230 more often than not, too. I think most bloggers are aware of the difference between opinion and defamation to some degree, but a few of them forget! (As we&#039;ve seen through TGM).  I think above all, it&#039;s important to not get one&#039;s priorities mixed up... there&#039;s a big difference between reporting a fair story or making an opinion-based call vs. twisting facts due to a bias from monetary gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting all this info together in one post. Lots of bloggers are only citing the case against Travel Golf Media and venting about it instead of explaining the entire story and revealing that the case is already closed!<br />
It&#8217;s good to be reminded of Section 230 more often than not, too. I think most bloggers are aware of the difference between opinion and defamation to some degree, but a few of them forget! (As we&#8217;ve seen through TGM).  I think above all, it&#8217;s important to not get one&#8217;s priorities mixed up&#8230; there&#8217;s a big difference between reporting a fair story or making an opinion-based call vs. twisting facts due to a bias from monetary gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Bharti</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2008/11/10/the-sinister-sibling-of-paid-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-671968</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Bharti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=9309#comment-671968</guid>
		<description>So what happen if Travel Golf Media is no more? Owner sold the company in 2007. New owners changed company name. In US, would the new company have to pay judgment, or the old owner still responsible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happen if Travel Golf Media is no more? Owner sold the company in 2007. New owners changed company name. In US, would the new company have to pay judgment, or the old owner still responsible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

