Flickr Alternatives for Copyright-Conscious Photographers

Filed as Features on December 1, 2008 12:38 pm

Repost This

Flickr has been in the spotlight a good deal recently, but a lot of it has not been good news. It has been revealed that Flickr, like Facebook, strips out copyright metadata from uploaded images. Combined with a confusing API, licensing scandals, companies selling photos as cell phone backgrounds and more, it is easy to see why some are skittish about keeping their images on the site.

This has some photographers, bloggers and artists uneasy about using Flickr or at least using the site exclusively. Many have begun seeking alternatives to Flickr but alternatives seem to be thin. Though image hosts such as Photobucket exist and are great for embedding images into other sites, they lack the sense of community that Flickr provides and, in the case of Photobucket, can raise copyright issues of their own.

So what other sites are there for photographers and artists that might fulfill some or all of Flickr’s function while providing a slightly better copyright environment? There are actually many, but here are three of the more important ones to watch.

PhoTrade

Photrade is a different kind of image hosting site. Rather than simply being a host for images, Photrade works more like a partnership between the photographer. Photrade offers prints, t-shirts, licenses and other items for sale, but, unlikes Photobucket or Flickr, it shares the revenues with its customers.

Photrade also offers a great deal of protection of the image, including the ability to ad a custom watermark over the image, privacy settings and more. Also, as with Flickr, you can embed the images into your site but, unlike Flickr, you have the option of earning ad revenue off of ads that run next to it (you can switch ads off during the embedding process if you wish).

Though Photrade’s community is nowhere near the size of Flickr, it is growing and is very tight-knit. All in all, Photrade is a logical choice for professional photographers and artists looking for a means to earn revenue from their images and want near-total control about how it is used.

It combines the best of most existing photo sharing sites with CafePress and other print on demand services.

deviantArt

DeviantArt has a reputation of being a less-professional image/art sharing site. However, it has many powerful tools that help to make it a contender for many photographers.

Like Photrade, deviantArt allows artists to sell prints of their work and receive revenue. It also has a watermarking system, though not one as robust as Photrade, and the ability to add additional licensing information, including Creative Commons, and upload information regarding a model release or permissions acquired.

deviantArt has a very robust community that is known to be very rabid about protecting their rights, even organizing groups to help patrol the Web looking for potential rips. The downside of deviantArt is that it has a very limited embedding ability, only working with a small handful of sites (though one could, theoretically, copy and paste the HTML elsewhere).

For the most part, dA is a self-contained, though very robust, community that offers a great deal of protection over one’s work and even preserves the metadata on the full-sized images.

SmugMug

Where Flickr and most photo sharing sites encourage everyone to join and participate, SmugMug is much more exclusive. The accounts on the site are for pay only, though there is a free trial period, andthe accounts can get relatively pricey, up to $150 per year for the highest level.

What SmugMug offers for that price is a clean user experience with beautiful galleries and zero advertisements as well as high levels of customization and usability. Also, at its highest account level, it offers a similar set of sales features as well as watermarking and other image protection tools.

Though metadata does not transfer on many of the embeddable images, which can be quite large, they do carry over on the original images. Likewise, they provide a standard set of privacy functions as well as the ability to limit the size of the embeddable/viewable images.

Though the pricing likely puts SmugMug out of the reach of the amateur photographer, professionals may be drawn to its simplicity, branding and flexibility. For those worried that Flickr may be too “open” and don’t want or need the very large community, it could be a good choice.

Conclusions

For most photographers, even with its flaws, Flickr is just fine. As long as one is careful about how they use Flickr and are aware of the concerns and potential problems, Flickr works great. With some preparation and forethought, it can still be a great service. I use it myself for my personal photos.

Still, there are some photographers, especially professional ones, that are more leery of these issues and want to better protect their work. Though it is almost impossible to beat the community that Flickr has built and the promotion it can provide, some, at least, are uncomfortable with the trade offs.

If you are one of those photographers, there are plenty of other image hosting/sharing sites out there that may be better suited for you. The three above are just a few examples.

Search around the net and, if you know of any others, feel free to leave a comment and let me (and everyone else) know.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

This post was written by

You can visit the for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.

Submissions & Subscriptions

Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg or Del.icio.us.

Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!



  1. By Linda posted on December 1, 2008 at 1:00 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Has any blogger actually been sued for breaching photo copyright?

    I’ve not heard of any.

    Reply

  2. By chris posted on December 1, 2008 at 3:43 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Another alternative in which the content producer/ photographer owns their content is Kadoo.com.

    Every user gets 10 FREE Gigs of storage space to manage, store and selectively share all their Photos, Files, original format and streaming Videos.

    The original content format is always preserved — so no degradation of the Photo size or format — and more importantly no requirement to print a photo every 60 days, etc…or lose your content.

    On top of that each user gets a full Portal, a full email account (if they desire) as well as the ability to publish their content to any of 40 existing Social Network Communities – all from just 1 place. Kadoo. If you need more space, you can purchase 1TB for $4.99 a month and you can print your photos from Kadoo as well.

    Sign up for FREE today @ http://www.kadoo.com!

    Reply

  3. By Jonathan Bailey posted on December 1, 2008 at 5:45 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Linda: Sued, not to my knowledge but I could be wrong. I don’t hear about every case. But many have been threatened with legal action and paid money to prevent lawsuits. It is actually very rare for cases to result in a lawsuit and even more rare for a lawsuit to go all the way to a judgment. Less than 1% of all cases involving a legal dispute of any variety result in a suit and only a fraction of those go all the way.

    Chris: Thanks for the tip!

    Reply

  4. By Tony posted on December 1, 2008 at 10:21 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Great post. I’ve actually been using a wordpress plug in that finds creative commons photo’s automatically on Flickr and allows me to post with no issues really.

    I actually had made the mistake of using some flickr photo’s that I wasn’t aware of that were “stripped” like you mentioned and I got a few nasty emails from the owners. EEK.

    Since I got the plug in no problems. However I’m glad to see there are a few more alternatives. Thank you!

    Reply

  5. By Craig Maunder posted on December 23, 2008 at 12:24 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Smugmug is the way I went when I discovered there was no stopping someone from stealing my photos as their own off Flickr. While it can be a little pricey (basic membership is now $40US), you can get your first year for cheaper than a Flickr pro account.

    All you have to do is enter the promo code YAHOO (1/2 price on all levels of subscriptions for the first year) and referral code: XYIzvlyAxTPgo (saves you another $5). So $40/2 – 5 = $15.

    In that light you can see it’s pretty cheap to check it out. (Actually I think you can get a 14 day trial for free first).

    Your photos are safe, the galleries look amazing, and if you put some effort in, the customization options are pretty incredible too.

    You can take a look at my page: craigmaunder.smugmug.com as an example of what you can get immediately upon signing up. And http://www.wolfsnap.com/gallery/4650775_dNFKq is a very good example of what you can do to customize things (it’s not that hard to do though… don’t sign up for the service provided there).

    Reply

    Your words are your own, so be nice and helpful if you can. If this is the first time you're posting a comment, it might go into moderation. Don't worry, it's not lost, so there's no need to repost it! We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it please.

    Current day month ye@r *