<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dictionary for kids adds &#8220;blog&#8221;, drops less fashionable words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/06/dictionary-for-kids-adds-blog-drops-less-fashionable-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/06/dictionary-for-kids-adds-blog-drops-less-fashionable-words/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel Cuala</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/06/dictionary-for-kids-adds-blog-drops-less-fashionable-words/comment-page-1/#comment-800243</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel Cuala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10440#comment-800243</guid>
		<description>As a father, I don&#039;t mind updating the dictionary if it can help my children to be more aware about new things. Besides, blogging is now a part of world.

However, as I checked the words that has been deleted, I think there were some that should still stay. It&#039;s history and it should be always be there.

Just my 2 cents though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a father, I don&#8217;t mind updating the dictionary if it can help my children to be more aware about new things. Besides, blogging is now a part of world.</p>
<p>However, as I checked the words that has been deleted, I think there were some that should still stay. It&#8217;s history and it should be always be there.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/06/dictionary-for-kids-adds-blog-drops-less-fashionable-words/comment-page-1/#comment-799575</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10440#comment-799575</guid>
		<description>This was big news in the UK when the changes were announced at the start of December with many people outraged by the word removed. Presumably they believe that if the word doesn&#039;t exist in the dictionary, the object doesn&#039;t exist in the real world.

 This could make it a crushing blow for beavers, cauliflower farmers and anyone with a diesel car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was big news in the UK when the changes were announced at the start of December with many people outraged by the word removed. Presumably they believe that if the word doesn&#8217;t exist in the dictionary, the object doesn&#8217;t exist in the real world.</p>
<p> This could make it a crushing blow for beavers, cauliflower farmers and anyone with a diesel car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

