<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NUJ &#8220;effing blogs&#8221; email link sparks comment furore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/20/nuj-effing-blogs-email-link-sparks-comment-furore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/20/nuj-effing-blogs-email-link-sparks-comment-furore/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/20/nuj-effing-blogs-email-link-sparks-comment-furore/comment-page-1/#comment-1126830</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10691#comment-1126830</guid>
		<description>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: art paintings</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/20/nuj-effing-blogs-email-link-sparks-comment-furore/comment-page-1/#comment-1119817</link>
		<dc:creator>art paintings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10691#comment-1119817</guid>
		<description>That it is &quot;Bloggers rejoice in having lower standards? Well, excuse me! I think this shows just how out of touch Mr Wheal is.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That it is &#8220;Bloggers rejoice in having lower standards? Well, excuse me! I think this shows just how out of touch Mr Wheal is.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/20/nuj-effing-blogs-email-link-sparks-comment-furore/comment-page-1/#comment-820496</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10691#comment-820496</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,

Yes, I did think after I&#039;d written it that, actually, humour wasn&#039;t the intent. It&#039;s certainly sparked a lively debate / argument over there! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>Yes, I did think after I&#8217;d written it that, actually, humour wasn&#8217;t the intent. It&#8217;s certainly sparked a lively debate / argument over there! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/20/nuj-effing-blogs-email-link-sparks-comment-furore/comment-page-1/#comment-820484</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10691#comment-820484</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t name the person who received the e-mail. Their Exchange username was there, but I very carefully didn&#039;t extrapolate to who it might actually be. Only someone within the NUJ who knew how their login naming protocol worked could name the user with 100% certainty.

And, to be honest, humour wasn&#039;t my main intention. My main intention was to point up both how some people associated with the union view blogging journalists, and how their understanding of the technology behind modern publishing is somewhat lacking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t name the person who received the e-mail. Their Exchange username was there, but I very carefully didn&#8217;t extrapolate to who it might actually be. Only someone within the NUJ who knew how their login naming protocol worked could name the user with 100% certainty.</p>
<p>And, to be honest, humour wasn&#8217;t my main intention. My main intention was to point up both how some people associated with the union view blogging journalists, and how their understanding of the technology behind modern publishing is somewhat lacking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

