<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechCrunch Rumor Control Failure Brings Out the Torches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea Live</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-1129968</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea Live</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-1129968</guid>
		<description>Couldnt be written any better. Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldnt be written any better. Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man Utd Live</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-1128707</link>
		<dc:creator>Man Utd Live</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-1128707</guid>
		<description>Upon further and more in-depth reading I agree with your pointthanks! :-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further and more in-depth reading I agree with your pointthanks! :-0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-1127716</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-1127716</guid>
		<description>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you However I’m experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Regards, Garden Furniture Manufacturer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Samurai Discount</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-1127243</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Samurai Discount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-1127243</guid>
		<description>For some reasons, I can relate to the content material of your post. In any case, I can say that you just do a very good job in updating your website. Additionally, I am continually searching for similar backlinks. I’d be more than pleased to start a hyperlink sharing with you. I don’t require you to spend time to put my link on the home page – simply approve this comment will do. Let me know more about your hyperlink, cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reasons, I can relate to the content material of your post. In any case, I can say that you just do a very good job in updating your website. Additionally, I am continually searching for similar backlinks. I’d be more than pleased to start a hyperlink sharing with you. I don’t require you to spend time to put my link on the home page – simply approve this comment will do. Let me know more about your hyperlink, cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-1126949</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-1126949</guid>
		<description>Imagined I might provide feedback together with claim awesome style, do one layout the item for you? Looks fabulous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagined I might provide feedback together with claim awesome style, do one layout the item for you? Looks fabulous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-862374</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-862374</guid>
		<description>I completely disgaree with Kathy.

TechCrunch is a cowboy in the Wild World Web. They shoot from the hip to get crappy press and this time it bit them in the butt. Good. About time - someone has deep enough pockets to say - This isn&#039;t right. I LOVE Last.fm&#039;s response on their blog.

TechCrunch was rated the most overrated blog by TIME magazine for a reason. TIME also stated &quot;stick a fork in them - they&#039;re done&quot;

Get back to reporting REAL NEWS rather than conjecture and tabloid headlines.

Kathy - wake up crap like this is no where near watergate - TechCrunch isn&#039;t even close to the same level.

But I agree with Kathy on one point only and that is if TechCrunch wants to be known as the National Enquirer of the Web then they are headed in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disgaree with Kathy.</p>
<p>TechCrunch is a cowboy in the Wild World Web. They shoot from the hip to get crappy press and this time it bit them in the butt. Good. About time &#8211; someone has deep enough pockets to say &#8211; This isn&#8217;t right. I LOVE Last.fm&#8217;s response on their blog.</p>
<p>TechCrunch was rated the most overrated blog by TIME magazine for a reason. TIME also stated &#8220;stick a fork in them &#8211; they&#8217;re done&#8221;</p>
<p>Get back to reporting REAL NEWS rather than conjecture and tabloid headlines.</p>
<p>Kathy &#8211; wake up crap like this is no where near watergate &#8211; TechCrunch isn&#8217;t even close to the same level.</p>
<p>But I agree with Kathy on one point only and that is if TechCrunch wants to be known as the National Enquirer of the Web then they are headed in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-828380</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-828380</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be honest, it isn&#039;t going to hurt TechCrunch much, but it should. TechCrunch gets things wrong too often and its amazing how much they get away with. Way too often they write a horrible headline accusing someone or some company of doing something terrible but make it all ok by adding a question mark to the end of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be honest, it isn&#8217;t going to hurt TechCrunch much, but it should. TechCrunch gets things wrong too often and its amazing how much they get away with. Way too often they write a horrible headline accusing someone or some company of doing something terrible but make it all ok by adding a question mark to the end of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy &#124; Virtual Impax</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-827390</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy &#124; Virtual Impax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-827390</guid>
		<description>Techcrunch did what they should have done - reported the story and then CORRECTED that report when more information became available. 

Watergate started as a &quot;rumor&quot; - so did the infamous &quot;DNA on a blue dress&quot; a few decades later.  

I agree that fresh and neutral journalism is the result of web 2.0 - but we must also recognize that no one gets it 100% correct 100% of the time - especially when a story is &quot;breaking&quot;.  

What we MUST expect is for the source to update the information as it becomes available.  What killed the credibility of CBS when they broke that horribly misleading &quot;news story&quot; was how long they &quot;ignored&quot; the &quot;facts&quot; of the story.  

Techcrunch did NOT ignore the facts and when they became available - they updated.  Bravo to them!    (Oh, and yeah - I agree that there is no such thing as &quot;bad publicity&quot; so it&#039;s a double win for them!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techcrunch did what they should have done &#8211; reported the story and then CORRECTED that report when more information became available. </p>
<p>Watergate started as a &#8220;rumor&#8221; &#8211; so did the infamous &#8220;DNA on a blue dress&#8221; a few decades later.  </p>
<p>I agree that fresh and neutral journalism is the result of web 2.0 &#8211; but we must also recognize that no one gets it 100% correct 100% of the time &#8211; especially when a story is &#8220;breaking&#8221;.  </p>
<p>What we MUST expect is for the source to update the information as it becomes available.  What killed the credibility of CBS when they broke that horribly misleading &#8220;news story&#8221; was how long they &#8220;ignored&#8221; the &#8220;facts&#8221; of the story.  </p>
<p>Techcrunch did NOT ignore the facts and when they became available &#8211; they updated.  Bravo to them!    (Oh, and yeah &#8211; I agree that there is no such thing as &#8220;bad publicity&#8221; so it&#8217;s a double win for them!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Eyes Squad</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-827359</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Eyes Squad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-827359</guid>
		<description>It may hurt a bit but in exchange, techcrunch got the publicity. Good or Bad, in the end its how popular the site is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may hurt a bit but in exchange, techcrunch got the publicity. Good or Bad, in the end its how popular the site is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tosh gary</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/02/24/techcrunch-rumor-control-failure-brings-out-the-torches/comment-page-1/#comment-826954</link>
		<dc:creator>tosh gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=10754#comment-826954</guid>
		<description>Those bloggers who work to make money by misleading are so 2003s. Twitter is making people to raise awareness and raise voice.
Fresh and neutral journ here to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those bloggers who work to make money by misleading are so 2003s. Twitter is making people to raise awareness and raise voice.<br />
Fresh and neutral journ here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

