<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ExecTweets Is Not The Twitter Revenue Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/03/24/exectweets-is-not-the-twitter-revenue-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/03/24/exectweets-is-not-the-twitter-revenue-model/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: FlashTweet</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/03/24/exectweets-is-not-the-twitter-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-912573</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashTweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=11377#comment-912573</guid>
		<description>The twitter revenue model will be Adwords on the search.twitter.com page. It is just a matter of time.

Great article btw... thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The twitter revenue model will be Adwords on the search.twitter.com page. It is just a matter of time.</p>
<p>Great article btw&#8230; thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Dorrell</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/03/24/exectweets-is-not-the-twitter-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-912501</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Dorrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=11377#comment-912501</guid>
		<description>I think you got the wrong quote from VentureBeat:

&quot;Both are excellent apps, but is Twitter gaining anything for featuring them on the site like it is with ExecTweets?&quot;

Smells like revenue to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you got the wrong quote from VentureBeat:</p>
<p>&#8220;Both are excellent apps, but is Twitter gaining anything for featuring them on the site like it is with ExecTweets?&#8221;</p>
<p>Smells like revenue to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andygo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/03/24/exectweets-is-not-the-twitter-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-909301</link>
		<dc:creator>andygo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=11377#comment-909301</guid>
		<description>hai.. nice post. its good info for me becouse im just a beginner to blogging</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hai.. nice post. its good info for me becouse im just a beginner to blogging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/03/24/exectweets-is-not-the-twitter-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-909214</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=11377#comment-909214</guid>
		<description>Agreed, good promotion for Twitter, FM, and Microsoft, but the real business will come with featured or sponsored tweets in my opinion - probably either looped in with Twitter search or with another Twitter product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, good promotion for Twitter, FM, and Microsoft, but the real business will come with featured or sponsored tweets in my opinion &#8211; probably either looped in with Twitter search or with another Twitter product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

