<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sam Sethi Talks About the TechCrunch Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Starr</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1104228</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13112#comment-1104228</guid>
		<description>Thord,

You&#039;re probably going to feel a lot less charitably inclined towards Sam Sethi after you read my comments.

First I&#039;ll share with you the words from the administrator at Companies House who is responsible for maintaining the list of disqualified directors.  In response to an inquiry made about Sethi&#039;s disqualification status one Jason Scanlon writes:

&quot; 
&gt; I have been informed by the Insolvency Service that Sanjiv Sethi is disqualified and the order was made by Slough County Court. They have provided me with all the information relating to Mr Sethi&#039;s disqualification. I will contact the court and request that they send me the relevant documentation. Once I am in receipt of this document and the record has been updated, I will let you know.
&gt; 
&gt; I hope this is sufficient.
&gt; 
&gt; Yours sincerely,
&gt; 
&gt; Jason Scanlon
&gt; 
&gt; Jason Scanlon
&gt; Subpoena Unit
&gt; Companies House
&gt; 02920 380073&quot;

I hope you will update your blog post accordingly.

While you&#039;re at it you might want to update your post to reflect the truth about my current status with respect to my suit against Sethi.

Initially I was awarded a default judgment when Sethi failed to appear in court on the day my case was heard.  As such, the court did not rule on the merits of my case (or even hear my case at all).  They simply noted that Sethi did not file a defense nor appear to defend against my claims and thus they awarded me a victory and also the amount I requested in my filing.

Sam subsequently filed a brief with the court requesting a hearing to set aside the default judgment and hear the actual case and give him an opportunity to defend himself.

While I cannot go into further detail since the new hearing is still impending what I can say is that it is completely untrue that a &quot;Verdict was overturned&quot; as Sam claims or that he is &quot;closing the case&quot; that I filed.

As it stands, Sam has to appear in court and explain exactly how it is that he doesn&#039;t owe me for the work I did, the travel expenses I incurred on behalf of Blognation at his direction or the interest, damages and legal fees I have incurred as a result of his failure to honor my agreement.

With the literal mountain of evidence that Sam has left strewn throughout the blogosphere as well as on archived Skype chats, emails and SMS exchanges it will be interesting to see how he can explain why he suddenly isn&#039;t obligated to pay me as he promised so many times he would.

Further it will be interesting to see how he can explain to the courts the fact that he has admitted lying to the Blognation editors about the funding situation and how I could have possibly confused his promises to pay me with that fact that I was apparently working for free (his claim).  Of course it is strange that he would promise to pay me something if I&#039;d agreed to work for nothing but then we&#039;ll see how the courts like his explanation.

In any case, those are the facts.

I&#039;m sure now you feel a bit pissed off at publishing what Sethi said to you considering so much of it was false.  But don&#039;t feel too bad.  You&#039;re in the same club as so many of us - simply honest people who Sam lied to without regard for what sort of pain or trouble it would cause them.  Now you have some idea of how it feels to be lied to by Sethi, but at least you didn&#039;t invest months of your life, thousands of dollars in out of pocket travel expenses or give up other high paying work based upon what Sam said.  So if you&#039;re pissed at Sam, just imagine how those of us that DID all of those things above must feel.

Oliver Starr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thord,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably going to feel a lot less charitably inclined towards Sam Sethi after you read my comments.</p>
<p>First I&#8217;ll share with you the words from the administrator at Companies House who is responsible for maintaining the list of disqualified directors.  In response to an inquiry made about Sethi&#8217;s disqualification status one Jason Scanlon writes:</p>
<p>&#8221;<br />
&gt; I have been informed by the Insolvency Service that Sanjiv Sethi is disqualified and the order was made by Slough County Court. They have provided me with all the information relating to Mr Sethi&#8217;s disqualification. I will contact the court and request that they send me the relevant documentation. Once I am in receipt of this document and the record has been updated, I will let you know.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I hope this is sufficient.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Yours sincerely,<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Jason Scanlon<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Jason Scanlon<br />
&gt; Subpoena Unit<br />
&gt; Companies House<br />
&gt; 02920 380073&#8243;</p>
<p>I hope you will update your blog post accordingly.</p>
<p>While you&#8217;re at it you might want to update your post to reflect the truth about my current status with respect to my suit against Sethi.</p>
<p>Initially I was awarded a default judgment when Sethi failed to appear in court on the day my case was heard.  As such, the court did not rule on the merits of my case (or even hear my case at all).  They simply noted that Sethi did not file a defense nor appear to defend against my claims and thus they awarded me a victory and also the amount I requested in my filing.</p>
<p>Sam subsequently filed a brief with the court requesting a hearing to set aside the default judgment and hear the actual case and give him an opportunity to defend himself.</p>
<p>While I cannot go into further detail since the new hearing is still impending what I can say is that it is completely untrue that a &#8220;Verdict was overturned&#8221; as Sam claims or that he is &#8220;closing the case&#8221; that I filed.</p>
<p>As it stands, Sam has to appear in court and explain exactly how it is that he doesn&#8217;t owe me for the work I did, the travel expenses I incurred on behalf of Blognation at his direction or the interest, damages and legal fees I have incurred as a result of his failure to honor my agreement.</p>
<p>With the literal mountain of evidence that Sam has left strewn throughout the blogosphere as well as on archived Skype chats, emails and SMS exchanges it will be interesting to see how he can explain why he suddenly isn&#8217;t obligated to pay me as he promised so many times he would.</p>
<p>Further it will be interesting to see how he can explain to the courts the fact that he has admitted lying to the Blognation editors about the funding situation and how I could have possibly confused his promises to pay me with that fact that I was apparently working for free (his claim).  Of course it is strange that he would promise to pay me something if I&#8217;d agreed to work for nothing but then we&#8217;ll see how the courts like his explanation.</p>
<p>In any case, those are the facts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure now you feel a bit pissed off at publishing what Sethi said to you considering so much of it was false.  But don&#8217;t feel too bad.  You&#8217;re in the same club as so many of us &#8211; simply honest people who Sam lied to without regard for what sort of pain or trouble it would cause them.  Now you have some idea of how it feels to be lied to by Sethi, but at least you didn&#8217;t invest months of your life, thousands of dollars in out of pocket travel expenses or give up other high paying work based upon what Sam said.  So if you&#8217;re pissed at Sam, just imagine how those of us that DID all of those things above must feel.</p>
<p>Oliver Starr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rise and fall of Blognation Follow up &#124; TechWag</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1104094</link>
		<dc:creator>Rise and fall of Blognation Follow up &#124; TechWag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13112#comment-1104094</guid>
		<description>[...] Sam Sethi did an e-mail interview with the Blog Herald that is worth reading if you have been following the story.  I did an email interview with Sethi, after he got in touch with me and wanted me to correct or retract the news story (which I didn’t do, obviously). I figured an interview would be the best way to get Sethi’s side of the story. Source: Blog Herald. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sam Sethi did an e-mail interview with the Blog Herald that is worth reading if you have been following the story.  I did an email interview with Sethi, after he got in touch with me and wanted me to correct or retract the news story (which I didn’t do, obviously). I figured an interview would be the best way to get Sethi’s side of the story. Source: Blog Herald. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tech: TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee &#124; tech3bite</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1104089</link>
		<dc:creator>tech: TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee &#124; tech3bite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13112#comment-1104089</guid>
		<description>[...] can read both Sethi&#8217;s version of the story, and Arrington&#8217;s version, which tell two different tales of Sethi&#8217;s work at TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read both Sethi&#8217;s version of the story, and Arrington&#8217;s version, which tell two different tales of Sethi&#8217;s work at TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee &#124; TechDozer.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1104086</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee &#124; TechDozer.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13112#comment-1104086</guid>
		<description>[...] can read both Sethi&#8217;s version of the story, and Arrington&#8217;s version, which tell two different tales of Sethi&#8217;s work at TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read both Sethi&#8217;s version of the story, and Arrington&#8217;s version, which tell two different tales of Sethi&#8217;s work at TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Sethi Talks About the TechCrunch Lawsuit &#124; Cookee Ninja - Business, Technology, Internet, World</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1092701</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Sethi Talks About the TechCrunch Lawsuit &#124; Cookee Ninja - Business, Technology, Internet, World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13112#comment-1092701</guid>
		<description>[...] The rest is here: Sam Sethi Talks About the TechCrunch Lawsuit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The rest is here: Sam Sethi Talks About the TechCrunch Lawsuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Do I Go About Getting Prescription Sleep Medication?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1090340</link>
		<dc:creator>How Do I Go About Getting Prescription Sleep Medication?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13112#comment-1090340</guid>
		<description>[...] Sam Sethi Talks About the TechCrunch Lawsuit &#124; The Blog Herald [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sam Sethi Talks About the TechCrunch Lawsuit | The Blog Herald [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Potts Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/03/sam-sethi-talks-about-the-techcrunch-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1087450</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Potts Weinstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13112#comment-1087450</guid>
		<description>BTW, he&#039;s probably suing in the UK because that&#039;s a *much* better place for his claims.  Here in the U.S., since we have constitutional free speech, it is much more difficult to get damages against a publisher ... but in the UK, the standards are much different.  I suspect he *must* win to keep the lawsuit in the UK ... good luck with that, unless he knows facts about TechCrunch that we don&#039;t know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, he&#8217;s probably suing in the UK because that&#8217;s a *much* better place for his claims.  Here in the U.S., since we have constitutional free speech, it is much more difficult to get damages against a publisher &#8230; but in the UK, the standards are much different.  I suspect he *must* win to keep the lawsuit in the UK &#8230; good luck with that, unless he knows facts about TechCrunch that we don&#8217;t know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

