<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Blogger, Are You Insured?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/08/hey-blogger-are-you-insured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/08/hey-blogger-are-you-insured/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/08/hey-blogger-are-you-insured/comment-page-1/#comment-1127479</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13163#comment-1127479</guid>
		<description>Can I just say what a relief to seek out somebody who really is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You positively know methods to deliver a problem to gentle and make it important. Extra people must read this and understand this aspect of the story. I cant consider youre not more widespread because you undoubtedly have the gift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just say what a relief to seek out somebody who really is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You positively know methods to deliver a problem to gentle and make it important. Extra people must read this and understand this aspect of the story. I cant consider youre not more widespread because you undoubtedly have the gift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/08/hey-blogger-are-you-insured/comment-page-1/#comment-1126667</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13163#comment-1126667</guid>
		<description>I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work and exposure! Keep up the great works guys I’ve added you guys to our blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. This sort of clever work and exposure! Keep up the great works guys I’ve added you guys to our blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wrench Set</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/08/hey-blogger-are-you-insured/comment-page-1/#comment-1120795</link>
		<dc:creator>Wrench Set</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13163#comment-1120795</guid>
		<description>there are insurance agencies that are scam too so make sure that you deal with legit insurance agencies *&quot;*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are insurance agencies that are scam too so make sure that you deal with legit insurance agencies *&#8221;*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/08/hey-blogger-are-you-insured/comment-page-1/#comment-1094278</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13163#comment-1094278</guid>
		<description>The quote from that article is misleading. In both cases those judgments were default judgments because the defendant failed to make an appearance at all. In the case of the haunted mill, for example, the judge ruled a defendant who had also made the haunted claim in a book had not committed libel, but entered a default judgment for the blogger because he or she failed to appear.

In both cases if the defendant had actually bothered to appear, the court almost certainly would have ruled in their favor since neither statement rises to the U.S. standard of libel.

There&#039;s only one case that the Media Law Resource Center says it is aware of a blogger getting sued and actually losing and having to pay damages, and that was clearly a legit case of libel where the idiot posting should have known better -- a man upset with is lawyer over a monetary dispute claimed in his blog that the lawyer was engaged in a bribery scheme with a local judge (http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1173363835339)

So unless you&#039;re going to be posting maliciously false items about people, libel insurance seems like a waste of money for the average blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote from that article is misleading. In both cases those judgments were default judgments because the defendant failed to make an appearance at all. In the case of the haunted mill, for example, the judge ruled a defendant who had also made the haunted claim in a book had not committed libel, but entered a default judgment for the blogger because he or she failed to appear.</p>
<p>In both cases if the defendant had actually bothered to appear, the court almost certainly would have ruled in their favor since neither statement rises to the U.S. standard of libel.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s only one case that the Media Law Resource Center says it is aware of a blogger getting sued and actually losing and having to pay damages, and that was clearly a legit case of libel where the idiot posting should have known better &#8212; a man upset with is lawyer over a monetary dispute claimed in his blog that the lawyer was engaged in a bribery scheme with a local judge (<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1173363835339" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1173363835339</a>)</p>
<p>So unless you&#8217;re going to be posting maliciously false items about people, libel insurance seems like a waste of money for the average blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

