<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Choice of First or Well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/09/the-choice-of-first-or-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/09/the-choice-of-first-or-well/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Furie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/09/the-choice-of-first-or-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1097710</link>
		<dc:creator>Furie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13208#comment-1097710</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found recently that the printed media, which normally has the time to get things right, has been instrumental in spreading disinformation. http://my.opera.com/Furie/blog/show.dml/3997989 is an example of The Guardian newspaper doing that. Even now, days later the story is still being spread around via retweets etc. What starts as one institution not researching a piece soon becomes an epidemic of unresearched information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found recently that the printed media, which normally has the time to get things right, has been instrumental in spreading disinformation. <a href="http://my.opera.com/Furie/blog/show.dml/3997989" rel="nofollow">http://my.opera.com/Furie/blog/show.dml/3997989</a> is an example of The Guardian newspaper doing that. Even now, days later the story is still being spread around via retweets etc. What starts as one institution not researching a piece soon becomes an epidemic of unresearched information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaceDriven</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/09/the-choice-of-first-or-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1097322</link>
		<dc:creator>RaceDriven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13208#comment-1097322</guid>
		<description>I would rather be good (well), then be first, because I would rather be correct, then have to correct it later after being first.

When it comes to Michael Jackson&#039;s death, that day I heard about it on the 5:30 PM evening news, sometime in that half hour block, the news was a local FOX station that said according to TMZ, Michael Jackson is died (with all do respect), however I heard later that Jackson didn&#039;t officially pass away until after 6pm, so in this case if the report was correct that he passed away after 6pm, its not good to be first, they quoted someone as being died, when he wasn&#039;t.

Like I said, I would rather good - check all of my sources and be correct, then be just first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather be good (well), then be first, because I would rather be correct, then have to correct it later after being first.</p>
<p>When it comes to Michael Jackson&#8217;s death, that day I heard about it on the 5:30 PM evening news, sometime in that half hour block, the news was a local FOX station that said according to TMZ, Michael Jackson is died (with all do respect), however I heard later that Jackson didn&#8217;t officially pass away until after 6pm, so in this case if the report was correct that he passed away after 6pm, its not good to be first, they quoted someone as being died, when he wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Like I said, I would rather good &#8211; check all of my sources and be correct, then be just first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Merrett</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/09/the-choice-of-first-or-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1096112</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Merrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13208#comment-1096112</guid>
		<description>Why not break one of the old rules of blogging and get basic news out first, then followup with additional news, research, interview etc. as time goes on. Hence my recent Performancing post &lt;a href=&quot;http://performancing.com/tips_for_creating_timely_yet_comprehensive_blog_posts/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tips for creating timely yet comprehensive blog posts&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not break one of the old rules of blogging and get basic news out first, then followup with additional news, research, interview etc. as time goes on. Hence my recent Performancing post <a href="http://performancing.com/tips_for_creating_timely_yet_comprehensive_blog_posts/" rel="nofollow">Tips for creating timely yet comprehensive blog posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

