Gawker Media is Back to Promoting Pageviews

Filed as Features on July 10, 2009 6:13 pm

Repost This

Gawker Media has had a good year so far, with ad revenue up 35% when the industry is suffering. The network clocked 334 million pageviews in June, and Nick Denton is happy. He is, in fact, so happy that he’s bringing pageviews to the table again, with bonuses for writers reaching their individual targets. This from an internal memo published on the Nieman Journalism Lab blog.

Don’t all get excited: the levels will be modest; aimed at the writers who aren’t paid as much as their traffic would warrant; and we’re only committing to bonuses for the second half of this year. Chris Batty’s sales and creative services teams have done an impressive job in bucking the advertising slump; but we have no idea how long we can continue to out-perform competitors.

He’s also mentioning the new commenting system and policy change, further outlined in a Jezebel post. Skipping that, the memo actually gives some insight in how Denton & Co. thinks about comments.

The favored commenters will be silent; and the illiterate ones will rant, well, illiterately. But we’ll be able to encourage the kind of discussion that *we* want — not one that is dominated merely by the most prolific of our commenters. It’s our party; we get to decide who comes.

People overall usually find it easier to complain and criticize, than to offer kind words and encouragement. Especially when you hit the mainstream, the trolling out there is somewhat overwhelming at times.

Anyway, the comment changes will roll out across the network today, and the pageview bonus system is valid for the coming six months. If you’re curious about who’s getting the most pageviews, check out the public stats,

Tags: , , , , ,

This post was written by

You can visit the for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.

Submissions & Subscriptions

Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg or Del.icio.us.

Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!



  1. By mickerlodeon posted on July 11, 2009 at 9:05 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    As long as they aren’t paying people based on how many pageviews they are getting I’m fine with it. I have no problem with bonuses for people who surpass they’re individual targets. It is when they start paying people less that I would start to get upset with them.

    Reply

  2. By Joshua Bolin posted on July 27, 2009 at 6:12 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    After blogging for the last year– watching pageviews and counting visitors I say kudos for what the Gawker team has accomplished. Thank you for the article.

    Jb.

    Reply

  3. Gawker Media Revenues Up 45%, So Much for the Adcopalypse | The Blog HeraldJuly 28, 2009 at 3:18 pm
  4. Gawker Media Revenues Up 45%, So Much for the Adcopalypse | OpenABlogJuly 30, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Your words are your own, so be nice and helpful if you can. If this is the first time you're posting a comment, it might go into moderation. Don't worry, it's not lost, so there's no need to repost it! We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it please.

    Current day month ye@r *