<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gawker Media is Back to Promoting Pageviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/10/gawker-media-back-to-promoting-pageviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/10/gawker-media-back-to-promoting-pageviews/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gawker Media Revenues Up 45%, So Much for the Adcopalypse &#124; OpenABlog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/10/gawker-media-back-to-promoting-pageviews/comment-page-1/#comment-1103993</link>
		<dc:creator>Gawker Media Revenues Up 45%, So Much for the Adcopalypse &#124; OpenABlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13228#comment-1103993</guid>
		<description>[...] Good news for Nick Denton &amp; Co., his Gawker Media reports that revenues are up by 45% in first half of 2009. So much for that “adcopalypse” where Denton spoke about 40% decreases in ads online last year, and warned media outlets to cut their costs why they still could. Gawker Media certainly did that, but it hardly hurt them, it would seem. They even brought back the pageview bonuses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good news for Nick Denton &amp; Co., his Gawker Media reports that revenues are up by 45% in first half of 2009. So much for that “adcopalypse” where Denton spoke about 40% decreases in ads online last year, and warned media outlets to cut their costs why they still could. Gawker Media certainly did that, but it hardly hurt them, it would seem. They even brought back the pageview bonuses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gawker Media Revenues Up 45%, So Much for the Adcopalypse &#124; The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/10/gawker-media-back-to-promoting-pageviews/comment-page-1/#comment-1103926</link>
		<dc:creator>Gawker Media Revenues Up 45%, So Much for the Adcopalypse &#124; The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13228#comment-1103926</guid>
		<description>[...] by Thord Daniel Hedengren   Good news for Nick Denton &amp; Co., his Gawker Media reports that revenues are up by 45% in first half of 2009. So much for that &#8220;adcopalypse&#8221; where Denton spoke about 40% decreases in ads online last year, and warned media outlets to cut their costs why they still could. Gawker Media certainly did that, but it hardly hurt them, it would seem. They even brought back the pageview bonuses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Thord Daniel Hedengren   Good news for Nick Denton &amp; Co., his Gawker Media reports that revenues are up by 45% in first half of 2009. So much for that &#8220;adcopalypse&#8221; where Denton spoke about 40% decreases in ads online last year, and warned media outlets to cut their costs why they still could. Gawker Media certainly did that, but it hardly hurt them, it would seem. They even brought back the pageview bonuses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Bolin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/10/gawker-media-back-to-promoting-pageviews/comment-page-1/#comment-1103866</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Bolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13228#comment-1103866</guid>
		<description>After blogging for the last year-- watching pageviews and counting visitors I say kudos for what the Gawker team has accomplished. Thank you for the article.

Jb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After blogging for the last year&#8211; watching pageviews and counting visitors I say kudos for what the Gawker team has accomplished. Thank you for the article.</p>
<p>Jb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickerlodeon</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/10/gawker-media-back-to-promoting-pageviews/comment-page-1/#comment-1097497</link>
		<dc:creator>mickerlodeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13228#comment-1097497</guid>
		<description>As long as they aren&#039;t paying people based on how many pageviews they are getting I&#039;m fine with it. I have no problem with bonuses for people who surpass they&#039;re individual targets. It is when they start paying people less that I would start to get upset with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as they aren&#8217;t paying people based on how many pageviews they are getting I&#8217;m fine with it. I have no problem with bonuses for people who surpass they&#8217;re individual targets. It is when they start paying people less that I would start to get upset with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

