<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Make Sure Your Blog Post is Ready for Publication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/11/post-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/11/post-ready/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Easton Ellsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/11/post-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-1101554</link>
		<dc:creator>Easton Ellsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13251#comment-1101554</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys for the great comments!

Yeah, checking for related resources both in your stable and among other people&#039;s works is what I mean ... which of course should be done well before the final &quot;ready to publish?&quot; check. But it can&#039;t hurt to make extra sure right at the end.

Yup, just get it out there and start a thread. It&#039;s what blogs lend themselves to. Comments are so valuable. And tweets and diggs and all the other conversations that can go on because of the initial post. Ideally it leads to offline conversations and relationships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys for the great comments!</p>
<p>Yeah, checking for related resources both in your stable and among other people&#8217;s works is what I mean &#8230; which of course should be done well before the final &#8220;ready to publish?&#8221; check. But it can&#8217;t hurt to make extra sure right at the end.</p>
<p>Yup, just get it out there and start a thread. It&#8217;s what blogs lend themselves to. Comments are so valuable. And tweets and diggs and all the other conversations that can go on because of the initial post. Ideally it leads to offline conversations and relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darnell Clayton</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/11/post-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-1099452</link>
		<dc:creator>Darnell Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13251#comment-1099452</guid>
		<description>I think #3 is where I struggle with a lot (as I always want a post to be perfect before it goes live).

Perhaps I&#039;ll focus more on producing the content (regardless of its imperfections) than making it entirely flawless. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think #3 is where I struggle with a lot (as I always want a post to be perfect before it goes live).</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;ll focus more on producing the content (regardless of its imperfections) than making it entirely flawless. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan_geronimo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/07/11/post-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-1098231</link>
		<dc:creator>jan_geronimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13251#comment-1098231</guid>
		<description>Creating a check list is a great idea - especially about making sure that the links work.  But shouldn&#039;t checking for related resources to cite be  part of the pre-writing process called research?  Just saying.  Okay, I think what you&#039;re saying is to search for something like related posts.

Number 3 sounds a good idea - making sure the post is imperfect.  It will be easier for readers to interact with the post if there&#039;s something for him to add to the discussion.  If the post is perfect - what&#039;s there else to say?  Nothing, perhaps I&#039;d just nod my head in agreement and move on, without leaving a reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating a check list is a great idea &#8211; especially about making sure that the links work.  But shouldn&#8217;t checking for related resources to cite be  part of the pre-writing process called research?  Just saying.  Okay, I think what you&#8217;re saying is to search for something like related posts.</p>
<p>Number 3 sounds a good idea &#8211; making sure the post is imperfect.  It will be easier for readers to interact with the post if there&#8217;s something for him to add to the discussion.  If the post is perfect &#8211; what&#8217;s there else to say?  Nothing, perhaps I&#8217;d just nod my head in agreement and move on, without leaving a reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

