<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Claims Ownership of &#8216;Retweet&#8217;, A New Debacle In The Making?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/17/twitter-claims-ownership-of-retweet-a-new-debacle-in-the-making/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/17/twitter-claims-ownership-of-retweet-a-new-debacle-in-the-making/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering the blogosphere, Web 2.0, new technology, and related topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:10:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: YouPage</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/17/twitter-claims-ownership-of-retweet-a-new-debacle-in-the-making/comment-page-1/#comment-1104426</link>
		<dc:creator>YouPage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13775#comment-1104426</guid>
		<description>Another case of history repeating itself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another case of history repeating itself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turquoisefish</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/17/twitter-claims-ownership-of-retweet-a-new-debacle-in-the-making/comment-page-1/#comment-1104423</link>
		<dc:creator>turquoisefish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13775#comment-1104423</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just tweet, someone in my stream was really upset &amp; blogged about this already (in the who does twitter think they are &amp; forgetting who got them here manner); as a third party developer with twitter in the name, this twit had received a cease &amp; desist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just tweet, someone in my stream was really upset &amp; blogged about this already (in the who does twitter think they are &amp; forgetting who got them here manner); as a third party developer with twitter in the name, this twit had received a cease &amp; desist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Decker</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/17/twitter-claims-ownership-of-retweet-a-new-debacle-in-the-making/comment-page-1/#comment-1104419</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13775#comment-1104419</guid>
		<description>Not really a big deal I don&#039;t think.
Like Myspace (and Facebook now).. within a few years Twitter too will decline and this whole retweet nonsense will get deprecated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really a big deal I don&#8217;t think.<br />
Like Myspace (and Facebook now).. within a few years Twitter too will decline and this whole retweet nonsense will get deprecated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
