<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tr.im Saga Continues. In This Episode: tr.im to be Community Owned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/tr-im-saga-continues-in-this-episode-tr-im-to-be-community-owned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/tr-im-saga-continues-in-this-episode-tr-im-to-be-community-owned/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Buscall</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/tr-im-saga-continues-in-this-episode-tr-im-to-be-community-owned/comment-page-1/#comment-1104422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Buscall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13800#comment-1104422</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t appreciate the constant repositioning from the Nambu network regarding Tr.im but hopefully things will settle down now. 

I DO think, however, that this is just a case of having to grow up in public. Clearly, they were trying to communicate publically before having thought through various strategies. 

The one thing I really miss from them is some statement about the Nambu Twitter client. What does all this mean for the client?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t appreciate the constant repositioning from the Nambu network regarding Tr.im but hopefully things will settle down now. </p>
<p>I DO think, however, that this is just a case of having to grow up in public. Clearly, they were trying to communicate publically before having thought through various strategies. </p>
<p>The one thing I really miss from them is some statement about the Nambu Twitter client. What does all this mean for the client?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

