<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is The Actual Cost of Your Blogging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/</link>
	<description>The leading source of news covering social media and the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Madalyn Leavell</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1130903</link>
		<dc:creator>Madalyn Leavell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 07:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1130903</guid>
		<description>Forgive my stupidity, but I can&#039;t for the life of me find your sites rss feeds. Mind directing me to it? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my stupidity, but I can&#8217;t for the life of me find your sites rss feeds. Mind directing me to it? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1127614</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1127614</guid>
		<description>Outstanding post! I 1st found your web site a week ago, and I subscribed to the RSS feed within the rather same day. I’ve some awesome tips and hints for some upcoming blogposts you could publish. I will forward you an e-mail soon. Maintain up the excellent your job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding post! I 1st found your web site a week ago, and I subscribed to the RSS feed within the rather same day. I’ve some awesome tips and hints for some upcoming blogposts you could publish. I will forward you an e-mail soon. Maintain up the excellent your job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Stream</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1126762</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1126762</guid>
		<description>An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you need to write extra on this matter, it won’t be a taboo topic however usually people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you need to write extra on this matter, it won’t be a taboo topic however usually people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1125228</link>
		<dc:creator>backlinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1125228</guid>
		<description>Finest backlinks links services - generate Leading rankings and substantial website visitors using our powerful one way links plans. Most powerful &amp; cost-effective links service of all time! backlinksGod.com - internet marketing - inbound links - search engine optimization - search engine optimization techniques - social media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finest backlinks links services &#8211; generate Leading rankings and substantial website visitors using our powerful one way links plans. Most powerful &amp; cost-effective links service of all time! backlinksGod.com &#8211; internet marketing &#8211; inbound links &#8211; search engine optimization &#8211; search engine optimization techniques &#8211; social media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart Boy Designs</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104786</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart Boy Designs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104786</guid>
		<description>Opportunity costs can become quite extensive - so it&#039;s important that we monitor site traffic increases, etc...and see if our efforts are really beginning to pay off. Otherwise - a new approach or technique is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opportunity costs can become quite extensive &#8211; so it&#8217;s important that we monitor site traffic increases, etc&#8230;and see if our efforts are really beginning to pay off. Otherwise &#8211; a new approach or technique is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104666</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104666</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. The most expensive cost is opportunity cost. The feeling is so uneasy when you start working as a full time blogger. There won&#039;t be a stable income. And, my experience, time seems pass faster when you are working as a blogger. I think time management is more important than other cost management, like software, equirment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. The most expensive cost is opportunity cost. The feeling is so uneasy when you start working as a full time blogger. There won&#8217;t be a stable income. And, my experience, time seems pass faster when you are working as a blogger. I think time management is more important than other cost management, like software, equirment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104568</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Opportunity Costs. Now this is one aspect of costing that’s a bit more difficult to compute for. Opportunity cost basically refers to the money you could potentially earn or gain if you were doing something else. For instance, instead of earning $2,000 a month from ads on your blog, you could be earning $6,000 per month working as a designer or a developer at a local company. So the opportunity cost here is $6,000 less $2,000, which amounts to $4,000.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Chances are that if you are running a site capable of generating that much ad revenue, you are already at the point where you could start earning money by writing books and doing other work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Opportunity Costs. Now this is one aspect of costing that’s a bit more difficult to compute for. Opportunity cost basically refers to the money you could potentially earn or gain if you were doing something else. For instance, instead of earning $2,000 a month from ads on your blog, you could be earning $6,000 per month working as a designer or a developer at a local company. So the opportunity cost here is $6,000 less $2,000, which amounts to $4,000.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chances are that if you are running a site capable of generating that much ad revenue, you are already at the point where you could start earning money by writing books and doing other work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104517</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104517</guid>
		<description>If you think about it... its all distributed across all computing activities. You use your software for other things too, besides blogging. Otherwise, outsourcing would have cost an arm and a leg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about it&#8230; its all distributed across all computing activities. You use your software for other things too, besides blogging. Otherwise, outsourcing would have cost an arm and a leg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katrina March</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104494</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrina March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104494</guid>
		<description>True, these expenses exist.  That is why bloggers do everything to optimize their sites, and to be able to earn more than the amount they have to pay each month.  However, given that a person is already an internet-addict for some years and then, one day, just decides to try blogging and earn money from it, then he can &quot;ignore&quot; software, equipment, and utility costs.  Although these costs are present, yet they are part of a very good investment, as long as one endures well in blogging and online marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, these expenses exist.  That is why bloggers do everything to optimize their sites, and to be able to earn more than the amount they have to pay each month.  However, given that a person is already an internet-addict for some years and then, one day, just decides to try blogging and earn money from it, then he can &#8220;ignore&#8221; software, equipment, and utility costs.  Although these costs are present, yet they are part of a very good investment, as long as one endures well in blogging and online marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris P</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104478</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104478</guid>
		<description>Interesting article though I would suggest making more about the value of your time in this equation, and I don&#039;t mean how much could you earn working for somebody else.

How much is your time worth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article though I would suggest making more about the value of your time in this equation, and I don&#8217;t mean how much could you earn working for somebody else.</p>
<p>How much is your time worth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104461</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104461</guid>
		<description>How about the hours you put into reading blogs, researching and actually writing? Maybe you can compute it by the hour - say $10 per hour. This would reflect the same earnings per hour had you been working for someone else.

You also forgot the licenses for PhotoShop, Premiere, iWorks, iLife, MS Office, etc. How about other devices such as cellphone bills for 3G, digital camera, scanner, printer, etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the hours you put into reading blogs, researching and actually writing? Maybe you can compute it by the hour &#8211; say $10 per hour. This would reflect the same earnings per hour had you been working for someone else.</p>
<p>You also forgot the licenses for PhotoShop, Premiere, iWorks, iLife, MS Office, etc. How about other devices such as cellphone bills for 3G, digital camera, scanner, printer, etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104451</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104451</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Paulo! I have a brother named Paolo. And it was early dawn from where I am when I posted the comment. I guess my dyslexia was getting to me! I actually read your name as &quot;Paolo&quot; the first time!

And yes, I think it&#039;s harder to compute for the actual cost of blogging this way. Maybe I can also compute for it as a fraction of my total time working on computers and being online. Hey, I&#039;m an economist, but accounting is perhaps one of my worst subjects! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Paulo! I have a brother named Paolo. And it was early dawn from where I am when I posted the comment. I guess my dyslexia was getting to me! I actually read your name as &#8220;Paolo&#8221; the first time!</p>
<p>And yes, I think it&#8217;s harder to compute for the actual cost of blogging this way. Maybe I can also compute for it as a fraction of my total time working on computers and being online. Hey, I&#8217;m an economist, but accounting is perhaps one of my worst subjects! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104443</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104443</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I didn&#039;t know you were also a network admin. I guess that makes you blogging cost a lot harder to calculate precisely, since much of what you do must overlap these two activities.

And not to nag, but my name is Paulo, not Paolo. As awesome as it would probably be to be Italian, I&#039;m from Brazil and that&#039;s how we spell it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I didn&#8217;t know you were also a network admin. I guess that makes you blogging cost a lot harder to calculate precisely, since much of what you do must overlap these two activities.</p>
<p>And not to nag, but my name is Paulo, not Paolo. As awesome as it would probably be to be Italian, I&#8217;m from Brazil and that&#8217;s how we spell it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Angelo Racoma</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104439</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104439</guid>
		<description>You got that right, Paolo. I guess I forgot to compute cost as a fraction of how much time I actually devote to blogging. Perhaps I was thinking from the point of view of doing online work, and not blogging, &lt;em&gt;per se&lt;/em&gt;. So whether I watch videos on YouTube, read movie reviews or chat with colleagues, these could be related to the work I do, which is write on blogs and help run a network.

At any given time, I usually have two or three computers in front of me doing different things. One might be uploading files on FTP, one might be for reference, and another would usually run the word processor or the actual blog post window.

And yes, two of my laptops came without bundled OSes. I bought a copy of Vista for one, though, and XP for the other. At one time or another, I&#039;ve used a flavor of Linux as my main work OS, but these days, it&#039;s just Windows and OS X for simplicity&#039;s sake. I just can&#039;t stop tweaking and hacking on Linux, and it affects my productivity! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got that right, Paolo. I guess I forgot to compute cost as a fraction of how much time I actually devote to blogging. Perhaps I was thinking from the point of view of doing online work, and not blogging, <em>per se</em>. So whether I watch videos on YouTube, read movie reviews or chat with colleagues, these could be related to the work I do, which is write on blogs and help run a network.</p>
<p>At any given time, I usually have two or three computers in front of me doing different things. One might be uploading files on FTP, one might be for reference, and another would usually run the word processor or the actual blog post window.</p>
<p>And yes, two of my laptops came without bundled OSes. I bought a copy of Vista for one, though, and XP for the other. At one time or another, I&#8217;ve used a flavor of Linux as my main work OS, but these days, it&#8217;s just Windows and OS X for simplicity&#8217;s sake. I just can&#8217;t stop tweaking and hacking on Linux, and it affects my productivity! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogherald.com/2009/08/18/what-is-the-actual-cost-of-your-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1104436</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogherald.com/?p=13835#comment-1104436</guid>
		<description>Nice article. People often forget to punch in the routine expenses.

There&#039;s a few problems with your calculations. You assume that the only thing you use your computers and Internet connection for is blogging. In reality, you&#039;d have to calculate a fraction of the hardware, software and DSL subscription based on what portion of your use of these items is devoted to blogging. If you&#039;re reading XKCD, CNN.com or browsing YouTube, for example, you&#039;re using the computer, are logged into Windows or OS X, and are viewing the website thanks to your DSL connection, but not for the purpose of working on your blog. Also, you don&#039;t need more than one computer for blogging, even though you can use all of them to do so. If there&#039;s more than one on at the same time, chances are only one of them is blogging and the other shouldn&#039;t be counting towards your blogging expenses, unless it&#039;s being used in some auxiliary function (like displaying a reference text, though you could use only one computer and alt+tab between windows). It turns out that even if you do spend most of your &quot;connected time&quot; blogging, you can still get a substantial reduction in your monthly blogging cost, since the hardware and operating systems are the greatest portions of the overall cost.

And while this amounts to a personal preference (but then again so does the choice of what blogging software and domain provider you use, as well as what kind of hardware you buy), you can buy a PC without Windows pre-installed (though you can&#039;t get a Mac without OS X) and install a free operating system, like some flavor of Linux, BSD or Solaris. This would slice off the imputed cost of bundled software, not to mention (for me at least) the time I&#039;d spend formatting my computer and installing Ubuntu Linux anyways, during which I&#039;d be using up electricity.

There&#039;s lots of other ways to make small cuts. For example, if you&#039;re really cheap and live at a walking distance from a café with free Wi-Fi, you don&#039;t really need DSL in theory (though the feasibility of this plan is questionable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. People often forget to punch in the routine expenses.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a few problems with your calculations. You assume that the only thing you use your computers and Internet connection for is blogging. In reality, you&#8217;d have to calculate a fraction of the hardware, software and DSL subscription based on what portion of your use of these items is devoted to blogging. If you&#8217;re reading XKCD, CNN.com or browsing YouTube, for example, you&#8217;re using the computer, are logged into Windows or OS X, and are viewing the website thanks to your DSL connection, but not for the purpose of working on your blog. Also, you don&#8217;t need more than one computer for blogging, even though you can use all of them to do so. If there&#8217;s more than one on at the same time, chances are only one of them is blogging and the other shouldn&#8217;t be counting towards your blogging expenses, unless it&#8217;s being used in some auxiliary function (like displaying a reference text, though you could use only one computer and alt+tab between windows). It turns out that even if you do spend most of your &#8220;connected time&#8221; blogging, you can still get a substantial reduction in your monthly blogging cost, since the hardware and operating systems are the greatest portions of the overall cost.</p>
<p>And while this amounts to a personal preference (but then again so does the choice of what blogging software and domain provider you use, as well as what kind of hardware you buy), you can buy a PC without Windows pre-installed (though you can&#8217;t get a Mac without OS X) and install a free operating system, like some flavor of Linux, BSD or Solaris. This would slice off the imputed cost of bundled software, not to mention (for me at least) the time I&#8217;d spend formatting my computer and installing Ubuntu Linux anyways, during which I&#8217;d be using up electricity.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s lots of other ways to make small cuts. For example, if you&#8217;re really cheap and live at a walking distance from a café with free Wi-Fi, you don&#8217;t really need DSL in theory (though the feasibility of this plan is questionable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

