Comments on: Why Doesn’t Retweet.com Use Its Own URL Shortener?

By: BlogrPro

BlogrPro — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:30:37 +0000

Well. You made a mistake of pointing to http://rt.ny instead of http://rt.nu

Correct it.

By: derick

derick — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:54:07 +0000

todays “journalism” is getting worse and worse. Franky get a new job, your writing sucks.

By: Franky Branckaute

Franky Branckaute — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:13:42 +0000

@Jason, don’t new sites/platforms get 10′ time to prove they are better or they will be forgotten again nowadays?

@Cheetah, sure it was a biased approach. We have covered Retweet very often over the last week and Mesiab Labs has certainly managed to create some hype. I expected a much better platform and service because they claim to be the ‘real retweet button’ like @redwall_hp mentioned.

By: redwall_hp

redwall_hp — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:03:55 +0000

I most certainly won’t be using Retweet.com, nor will I dignify the service with a mention on my blog.

Not only is it a copycat service that doesn’t really add much to the original concept, the founder comes off as a jerk to me. The whole “real retweet button” nonsense is very unprofessional.

By: Cheetah

Cheetah — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:22:13 +0000

That was a rather biased approach… Atleast we know who has their panties in a bunch.

By: jason

jason — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:11:29 +0000

haha all the URL shortners get spam! bit.ly reported that they get over 2 million spam links a day!!! Didnt retweet.com launch yesterday in BETA?

How many sites release fully featured in BETA? Its craziness to see all the people trying to rip retweet.com to pieces when the site barely came out haha.. give me a break