What’s the Score on the Latest Google PR Crunch?

Filed as Editorial, Features on October 25, 2007 8:34 pm

If you’ve been reading up on the blogosphere lately, then you would probably be aware of the latest Google PageRank drops that several high-profile sites and blogs have been experiencing since the past couple of days. For one, the Blog Herald itself among a few of our other sites had been badly hit–from a PR 6 to a PR4. Hey, that’s lower than my own personal blog, and for that matter a lot of other blogs out there, including MFA and spam blogs, to be frank.

Other sites–notably high-profile blogs–have been hit, too. And these are not only the blogs, but also popular mainstream media sites, with several very trustworty newspaper sites included. Does that mean Google now deems them–and us–less trustworthy?

What’s the score with this latest PageRank crunch? Are we being penalized for monetizing links? Are we being penalized for bad inter-linking practices? These are the speculations as to what is most likely the reason behind the PR drops.

Andy Beard says these “favorites” have likely been slapped by Google for either (or both) selling links or extensive interlinking within one’s network.

Many of the reputable sources that have received a penalty are part of extensive blog networks, and they have one factor in common. They have massive interlinking between their network sites.

They may also sell links or advertising that passes PageRank on some of their less visible properties, but those properties benefit from the high pagerank sites that link to them, with sitewide links.

It is also being argued whether this is a PageRank update in general, or if Google is just penalizing a few, select sites for going against the Google guideline against artificially jacking up rankings through paid link schemes or link exchanges.

Some blog networks have been affected, while some have not. Those that exercise extensive intra-linking in their blogrolls, like b5media (via Technosailor), 9rules (via Scrivs) and Weblogs, Inc. were highly affected. Others that weren’t much into this practice were left mostly unscathed (if at all affected), such as Bloggy Network.

Whether it’s one thing or the other (as I’m not sure if anyone has actually confirmed the root cause as of this writing), one thing is for sure. Google has just shaken up the online economy. And I say this both as an economist and as a manager of a new media network.

Fact is that around the behemoth search and advertising company Google is built a secondary economy. Blogs and websites use PageRank as one primary metric for reputation and trustworthiness. Many site owners bank on their sites’ or domains’ PageRank, and use these to command or negotiate advertising rates.

It’s like the gold standard applied online. And with this mass PR drop, Google has just devalued the webmasters’ gold. In effect, Google has just caused the value of this thriving industry to fall in a single day. What was a thriving economy is being rendered worth less (while not worthless, of course).

But then again, we can argue that this economy is artificial in the first place–with people putting too much premium on PageRank, and especially with people putting a price tag on PR. But in that case, wouldn’t Google still be morally (and legally?) liable for killing off its competition? Do keep in mind that Google runs its own advertising program and is at the top of its game.

Other new media networks that were affected have expressed they are keeping their heads up high and will continue to cope and thrive. Likewise we at Splashpress Media admit it won’t be easy to overcome this challenge, but we know we will survive and move on and forward. It would take a little shift in strategies and priorities, sure. We live in a changing world. And with the fast-changing nature of new media, we should also know how to adapt well and keep in tune with the times.

Tags: , ,

This post was written by

You can visit the for a short bio, more posts, and other information about the author.

Submissions & Subscriptions

Submit the post to Reddit, StumbleUpon, Digg or Del.icio.us.

Did you like it? Then subscribe to our RSS feed!

  1. By Jeremy Steele posted on October 25, 2007 at 9:16 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I know of a few sites that aren’t part of a network but also suffered a nice drop, so there goes that theory.

    It’s a full-on update.


  2. By aaron posted on October 25, 2007 at 9:16 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I, for one, am glad this change occurred. I’m also kind of tired of hearing about it. In a few weeks, I fully expect to see some SERPs research and how these changes affected them.


  3. Digg Favorites Slapped By Google | Andy Beard - Niche MarketingOctober 25, 2007 at 10:11 pm
  4. By Alexander posted on October 25, 2007 at 11:30 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Grrreat! I was just entering the blogosphere several months ago with some real excitement!

    This is like the housing market or something…waiting it out for the boom times to return.


  5. By franky posted on October 25, 2007 at 11:40 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment


  6. What’s the Score on the Latest Google PR Crunch? « TheScroogeReportOctober 25, 2007 at 11:59 pm
  7. By Elisa Cundiff posted on October 26, 2007 at 2:06 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment


    If PR is “fools gold” then by what mark are blogs and online media supposed to use as an indicator of their advertising value?

    All of us are still guessing as to who was penalized and why. And if Google is just trying to keep us out of the loop, they’re doing a great job.

    A difficult market just became more uncertain. And even established web publishing companies aren’t doing so hot (though not by Google’s fault). I was rather depressed by this article, pointing to how unprofitable web publishing really can be. And these are the big players.


  8. | Blogging TipsOctober 26, 2007 at 11:01 pm
  9. By StStephen posted on October 27, 2007 at 6:30 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Hey, I’m not sure this PR update is over yet… perhaps its going to happen in phases?

    Here’s my observation: my site went from PR3 to PR4 so far. After the last PR update, it only had 3 inbound links per google.

    However since July, it now has hundreds inbound to the home page and at least 30K inbound to
    secondary pages.

    As of last night, the google number of inbound links reported by google webmaster tools is: ZERO.

    That’s right, 0. So, I’m wondering if the first dance phase perhaps involved some calculations excluding links… to be followed by a second phase that will deal with link counts??

    I’d love to compare notes with anyone on this – is anyone else seeing their google inbound count go to zero?


  10. By Emperor posted on October 29, 2007 at 8:29 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Dropping from PR6 to PR4 is a very hard hit. In my opinion Google is hitting blogs harder since they are the ones that sell links and are in a sense causing a lot of the spamming currently going around on the net. Many high profile blogs have been hit so yours is definitely not the only one.


  11. SONNIE’S PORCH » Blog Archive » Sonnie's Porch, A Notch Higher (PR 5)November 2, 2007 at 7:36 am
  12. By marke posted on November 4, 2007 at 1:51 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    If a web site relies soley on Google/Yahoo/etc page rank, they have only got themselves to blame when the “rules” change… because, if for no other reason they must be stupid to put all their eggs in one basket.


  13. EatonWeb to Phase Out PageRank in its Metrics Computation : The Blog HeraldNovember 16, 2007 at 8:13 pm
  14. Is Google Making A Lesson Out Of PayPerPost (… er, Izea)? : The Blog HeraldNovember 17, 2007 at 11:04 am
  15. By Muhammad Panhwar posted on November 18, 2007 at 6:00 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I for one, don’t really care about the page rank crunch. I’m not concerned about this at all. Google’s not everything in this World! There are other notable services also!


  16. By Khayte posted on January 27, 2008 at 1:45 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    Gawd, mine had gone to N/A too, I hate the fact that they have to reduce our PR’s just because we monetize our blogs. What’s the catch anyway? They do the same thing, too I guess on their ‘other’ websites perhaps. Damnn, it makes me go all crazy. –,


  17. By arjun posted on March 24, 2008 at 1:50 am
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I’ve been looking at many forums and it seems that those who got new unpaid incoming backlinks have also dropped in PR. There seems to be a vibe that many sites have dropped more than increased in PR. I’ve also come across many folks whose homepage has dropped in PR and now deep pages have an even higher PR.


  18. By Robert C - The Wholesale Products Guy posted on August 15, 2008 at 1:39 pm
    Want an avatar? Get a gravatar! • You can link to this comment

    I have done nothing with my website in terms of selling links, and, as far as I know, nothing nefarious in terms of anything on the “dark side” of SEO practices. Content in my articles section, accept for a few ezine articles, is written by me, so dupe content is not an issue.

    Maybe there is something in terms of links pointing to me that might have devalued my site from a PR4 to a PR 3, but, I have yet to understand what, if anything that may be.

    Basically, I am stumped. The site is five years old to boot! I could understand “slapping” me if I have sinned, but, I just dont’ know what those particular sins are.

    Robert C. The Wholesale Products Guy


    Your words are your own, so be nice and helpful if you can. If this is the first time you're posting a comment, it might go into moderation. Don't worry, it's not lost, so there's no need to repost it! We accept clean XHTML in comments, but don't overdo it please.