Picking The Best Practices From Old Media To Empower New Media

April 15, 2008 | By Thord Daniel Hedengren | Filed Under Features, Journalism

journalist.jpgThe blogosphere is ever in motion, one could write Yoda haiku on that topic. The swift turns means that anyone not wanting to end up second or third (or worse!) on a story need to make quick calls on whether to jump on it or not.

That could have been an explanation, had I or one of my dear writers here at The Blog Herald screwed up and reported something phony.

Which we have, in a way. We reposted the news that Twitter was testing ads, a story that TechCrunch broke, and have been denied by the Twitter folks. Sure, it is a denial that would make sense even if the story was true, but in this case I do believe that it is a sincere “no, we’re not doing ads on Twitter” due to the fact that the source have admitted that it was a mistake.

That’s not the point of this post.

TechCrunch made the call on this particular story. They went with it. That’s fine, as long as they correct their mistake and move on, something that they have, but only just, in the comments. Fine, I don’t pretend to be an authority on how to do these things, nor am I aiming any swings at this most excellent blog with this post.

I am merely stating that things are moving fast in the blogosphere, and that breaking a news story first means lots of traffic.

We like traffic, we bloggers, journalists, and would-be writers. We like the ego boost and we like the fact that we’re being read.

Most of us have no editor. No one to tell us to verify the story with a different source, or even call someone for a comment. That way we suck, we bloggers, because we are scared of the phone, don’t know how to speak to PR people, and don’t want to make fools of ourselves.

I am speaking in general terms here. I am not pointing fingers. I am merely stating the obvious.

Right now I’m doing an interview with the head of Instablogs for BloggerTalks. There’s a lot of talk of citizen journalism there, very interesting stuff. However, every time I see this happen, bloggers neglecting to dive a bit deeper into a story where it really isn’t even very hard work to do so, my belief in citizen journalism, in blogs as sources, get stinted.

Blogs are sources, there are great content out there. However, we can all get better, and we can all learn from the old media. Let’s pick the good parts from the ones who know what they are doing (which isn’t a general old media thing, I know). Things like research, follow-ups, verifying sources, and asking questions.

When we get that right, we’ll have true citizen journalism.


About the author: Thord Daniel Hedengren is a designer, writer, and blogger, and also the editor of The Blog Herald. He used to be a hotshot in the gaming industry in Sweden, but sold everything and went International. He founded the interview blog BloggerTalks, does loads of kickass design.

© Copyright 2008 The Blog Herald | Submit post to Blogosphere News | More articles by Thord Daniel Hedengren


Comments

6 Responses to “Picking The Best Practices From Old Media To Empower New Media”

  1. Of blogs, accuracy and editors - mathewingram.com/work on April 15th, 2008 1:55 pm

    [...] mistakes don’t get fixed that we have something to worry about, and as Thord Daniel Hedengren reminds us, we could all probably do better at that — regardless of what we call [...]

  2. Of blogs, accuracy and editors - mathewingram.com/media on April 15th, 2008 1:56 pm

    [...] mistakes don’t get fixed that we have something to worry about, and as Thord Daniel Hedengren reminds us, we could all probably do better at that — regardless of what we call [...]

  3. Matt Craven on April 15th, 2008 2:27 pm

    Very well said….

    We can’t have it both ways as bloggers - if we want the respect we sometimes demand of others in our role as new media - then we need to be willing to abide by some of the roles & guidelines of the “old media”….

    Matt

  4. Blowski on April 15th, 2008 8:24 pm

    Unfortunately, those at TechCrunch seem to be too arrogant and self-assured as the ‘kingmakers’ of the web2.0 era.

    If somebody disagrees with them, they slate them. I’m thinking of Duncan Riley’s attack on Louis Gray, because the latter said the former hadn’t understood the power of FriendFeed.

    When somebody does pick them up on a mistake, they choose to either:
    1. Ignore it, or
    2. Lambast the one who calls it

    TechCrunch - especially including Arrington and Riley - should read Om Malik, Matthew Ingram, Louis Gray to realise that good journalism can actually be polite and friendly.

  5. Lost at sea? « Content Ninja’s Weblog on April 18th, 2008 3:54 pm

    [...] Picking The Best Practices From Old Media To Empower New Media [via Zemanta] [...]

  6. M-Brain - Verkkovonkale » Arkisto » Kansalaisjournalismi, mitä se on? Onko sitä? on April 28th, 2008 7:59 am

    [...] Onko jokainen mielipide arvokas vai olisiko syytä myöntää, että vapaus vaikuttaa auttamattomasti laatuun? Vai pitäisikö lukijana myöntää, että foorumeilla kirjoitetaan niistä aiheista, jotka todella puhututtavat ja unohtaa toiveet sankarijournalisteista, jotka ruotivat blogeissaan epäkohtia ja pelastavat maailman turhalta byrokratialta? Parhaimmillaan sosiaalinen media tuo esille uusia ajatuksia ja näkökulmia, joita ei välttämättä voitaisi julkaista perinteisessä mediassa. Sosiaalisella medialla on tietenkin myös opittavaa ainakin lähteiden luotettavuuden suhteen. Tähän viittaa blogissaaan myös Tord Hedengren. [...]

Leave a Reply




Contributors

Our Blog Metrics

EatonWeb Portal
Performancing Metrics

Recommended

Advertise Here
Chitika Referral
Performancing Hive
Social Media Marketi
Splashpress Media

Powered by WordPress | Designed by Brian Gardner
Copyright © 2003 - 2008 by The Blog Herald - All Rights Reserved